← Back to articles
Trainers onlyAccess required About 3 min read
Framers Trainer Development

GETTING A WELL FORMED OUTCOME THROUGH OUR BIAS OF CAUSALITY

Causal thinking as a formula and process is at best only partially accurate.

Save
Share

Share this article

LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email

Anyone can open the preview. Full reading access still follows the article’s membership requirements.

More
Saved articles

Causal thinking as a formula and process is at best only partially accurate. This includes a mere portion of information from the entire system and reciprocal processes from which causal links and reasoning has been derived. A linear cause-effect way of thinking is over-simplistic as we miss critical factors. Thinking processes like complex equivalence and cause effect are processes we can learn, therefore we can see and hear how people are framing their model of the world. Logically these kinds of thinking processes deliver our most pervasive bias and we name them causality. By understanding and seeing the distortions only then can we learn how to clear the distortion(s) and reduce the confusion(s).

Causality thinking can be found in Neuro-Semantics through the meta-model, the meaning matrix, cognitive distortions, thinking fallacies and system thinking. Patterns of causality are typically identified under the logical level category of Distortion.