← Back to articles
Trainers onlyAccess required About 3 min read
Framers Trainer Development

HOW TO LOSE CREDIBILITY (Part 3)

It’s so easy to lose credibility.

Save
Share

Share this article

LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp Email

Anyone can open the preview. Full reading access still follows the article’s membership requirements.

More
Saved articles

It’s so easy to lose credibility. n this, my third post on the subject, I’ll provide you another four ways which you can undermine what your credibility as a trainer. By practicing any one of these four, you can tarnish your local Neuro-Semantic community and bring the field of Neuro- Semantics into disrepute. I hope you’re willing to seriously consider whether you could be making the following mistakes:

1: Not quote your sources: Neuro-Semantics is an eclectic field which has drawn from multiple sources, including General Semantics, NLP, Family Therapy, Hypnosis, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Gestalt Therapy, and many, many more. When asked “What’s the origin of the source of this model?” are you able to quote the source or do you say it’s Neuro-Semantics, when it’s not? Can you speak of the origins of the meta-programs and where they came from. There are many of them that have been sourced from numerous fields, can you state where they are from? If not, you run the risk of not knowing your topic.