DEALING WITH SYMPTOMS
Where there are problems, there are almost always symptoms. Incredibly there are many times when the symptoms feel worse than the problem.
The ISNS library
Public reflections on meaning, thinking, and personal development from the Neuro-Semantics community.
Where there are problems, there are almost always symptoms. Incredibly there are many times when the symptoms feel worse than the problem.
The great distinction is the difference between a problem and its symptoms.
When it comes to problem-solving, handling a problem occurs on a continuum.
Many people think that the art of solving problems means being creative or intelligent or lucky.
“It’s the economy, stupid!” was the winning slogan that played a big role in getting Bill Clinton elected as president.
While it’s easy to take the comment in the title (“It’s all in your head”) as a criticism or an insult, it is actually a recognition of your cognitive powers.
Now talk about a wild and crazy idea! Thriving on problems?! Really? Well, yes, that’s the vision of developing expertise in problem-solving.
For the past few days I have struggled with a question that I began considering when I heard the President’s State of the Union speech.
In the last blog we explored the three meta-levels of problems and because of those three meta-levels (Neurons #7), each level also triggers different kinds of symptoms.
Once you are ready to begin a meta probe into the meta-levels of the mind—you begin the journey to where we create meaning and where we create problems (Neurons 2026 #7).
Once there is a problem, there is problem solving. Once you or another person has created a problem which blocks him from reaching his desired outcome, you thereafter become engaged in problem-solving.
What you have to know, and not only ‘know,’ but fully realize at a feeling level, is that all problems occur in someone’s mind.
One thing is obvious in terms of developing your expertise in problem-solving—you have to up your game in how you think and the quality of your thinking.
My focus in the last post was to identify the typical and conventional ways we commonly approach problems which are not only wrong and do not work, but often makes things worse.
Let’s begin with the presence of a problem. Imagine that you have a problem or someone you know has a problem.
Here’s something audacious to imagine—imagine that you set out to solve a problem in five minutes.
A further historical critique of NLP claims, from sub-modalities and logical levels to modelling expertise and interpreting eye movements.
Michael Hall continues his critique of NLP terminology and assumptions, discussing states, identity labels, and memory.
The opening part of Michael Hall’s critique of recurring NLP claims examines non-verbal communication, body language, and ideas about the conscious and unconscious mind.
Michael Hall reflects on updating NLP manuals and models, making patterns easier to follow, and learning from decades of feedback.
A critical reflection on how neuroscience findings are interpreted, and on distinctions between the brain, the mind and the person.
Whose way of thinking would you choose to learn? A reflection on role models, modelling excellence and the influences on our thinking.
How can a wish become a vision, a decision and a mission? This reflection explores strategic thinking in everyday life.
Michael Hall reflects on the evolution of Meta-NLP and the thinking behind its 2025 personal-empowerment training.
Showing 25–48 of 56 articles
Join Neurons for free weekly reflections from Dr. L. Michael Hall.