THE META-COGNITION OF THE FOUR META-MODELS OF NLP
Given the expansive effectiveness of meta-cognition (Meta Reflection #28), does it surprise you that there are four meta-cognition models that comprise the core of NLP?
The Neuro-Semantics library
Public reflections on meaning, thinking, and personal development from the Neuro-Semantics community.
Given the expansive effectiveness of meta-cognition (Meta Reflection #28), does it surprise you that there are four meta-cognition models that comprise the core of NLP?
“One difference between a competent performer and a master in any field is that the master can go back and tell you exactly what it is that he has just done, and how he did it.
“The two modes of consciousness, observer and participant, are very much present in every part of science.”
A week ago, Bob Bodenhamer sent me a link to listen to a podcast of three “experts” in stuttering talk about NLP.
This post responds to the several people who have recently written to ask about the relationship between Meta-States and the Neuro-Logical Levels.
“Who are you?” That’s what he asked.
Most people confuse context with cause.
We could all be genius, says Korzybski, if only we clarify our symbolism and use it effectively.
When you make a linguistic map, there are numerous cognitive distortions to be aware of and to take into consideration.
Soon . . . we will be inaugurating the very first International Neuro-Semantic Conference.
It all began with the idea of “genius,” the focused state of intense concentration in which you are at your best with all of your resources available.
There’s a reason that I’ve been writing about semantic reactions.
In the last few Neuron posts about Korzybski and the foundations of NLP and Neuro-Semantics, I’ve been writing about the un-sanity of the process of identification that leads to…
The very first time that Bob Bodenhamer and I used The Matrix Model to model was the experience of speaking dis-fluency called “stuttering.”
To summarize from the last Neurons article in this series: if you semantically react to some trigger and let it “push your buttons,” you are reacting like an animal and copying…
I know that it might sound like an April Fool’s Joke, but it’s not.
As you know all too well, in your biological nature, you are an animal.
In creating his 1933 version of "neuro-linguistic training," Alfred Korzybski’s focus was to create a new non-Aristotelian system of language and semantics.
If you read Korzybski’s Science and Sanity you will find that he not only wrote a lot about the visual representational system, but he valued it as the most important one.
In 1992 I began writing about my discoveries in Korzybski’s original neuro-linguistics.
If you and I are a semantic class of life (series #5), then how do we learn to effectively handle our semantic nature so that we become less reactive semantically and avoid…
Read Science and Sanity and you will hear Korzybski repeatedly asserting that we humans are a semantic class of life.
What’s happening in our world?
One of the first things I sought to understand when I first studied NLP was where did the NLP presuppositions come from and who contributed which presuppositions.
Showing 913–936 of 1183 resources
Join Neurons for free weekly reflections from Dr. L. Michael Hall.