DISTINGUISHING REASONS FROM EXCUSES
It is so easy to become confused whenever two things that should be separated are fused together into one thing.
The Neuro-Semantics library
Public reflections on meaning, thinking, and personal development from the Neuro-Semantics community.
It is so easy to become confused whenever two things that should be separated are fused together into one thing.
Here is a distinction that most people do not know and do not make and because they don’t, it creates tremendous mental and emotional distress in their lives.
After the last post, another question was brought to my attention, “What’s the difference between self-confidence and ego-strength?”
This distinction comes by way of Mauritius where Bruneau Woomed asked if I’d write about it.
To think with clarity and precision is to make critical distinctions—distinctions that provide essential maps if we’re to experience well-being and sanity.
Many years ago I learned an especially important principle, a principle that provided an unique insight, which in turn changed my life.
With this article, I am concluding this series on Critical Thinking about Facts.
In this series on Critical Thinking about Facts, we have seen that there are lots of problems with facts.
So, we have the problem of out-of-context “facts.”
A day came in Maslow’s life when he made a big semantic leap.
There are many different kinds of statements.
If there’s anything really unique to the Neuro-Semantics approach, it is that we train, coach, consult, parent, do therapy, and live our lives inside–out.
First, the is. What exists—where, when, and in what way.
It was reported this week that there’s a new variant, the omicron.
When you reason, you reason using facts and about facts.
In this deep dive into facts, what they are, how to identify a true fact from a false one, how to establish factual evidence, there has been playing out on the media in the past…
After General Ulysses S.
If you have been following these articles on facts you know that not all facts are the same.
Once you have a health skepticism about “the facts” that you are regularly fed by the media, you can prepare yourself to think through those facts to determine their validity…
“Just the facts, ma’am, just the facts.”
After writing about Media Ethics (#69) last week and writing about “facts,” I decided that I would do some critical thinking about facts.
More than 25 years ago, Erich Fromm, a psychoanalyst and philosopher of Humanistic Psychology wrote several books about social problems.
Over the past weekend (Oct.
That was the question Geraldine asked.
Showing 265–288 of 1183 resources
Join Neurons for free weekly reflections from Dr. L. Michael Hall.